A pale wood infrared cabin in a sunlit domestic room

Infrared or traditional: which one suits your house

Almost everyone arrives at this decision from the wrong end. They read about benefits, decide they want a sauna, and only then discover there are two completely different products wearing the same word.

Here is the version that would have saved you the reading.

One fact does most of the work

You can read a book in an infrared cabin.

That is not a marketing line, it is a consequence of the temperature. Infrared runs from 59 to 140°F. A traditional sauna runs from 158 to 194°F. At 190 you are not reading anything. You are sitting still, breathing carefully, and counting.

So the two products ask for different evenings. Traditional is a short hard visit, ten or fifteen minutes, usually in rounds with something cold in between. Infrared is a long mild sit, thirty to forty-five minutes, which you could do in a robe with a cup of tea beside you.

Neither is the better one. They are answers to different questions.

A carbon infrared heater panel glowing deep red

Where the heat comes from

A traditional sauna heats the air. A stove brings a pile of volcanic stones up to temperature, the stones heat the room, and the room heats you. Pour water on the stones and you get a wave of steam that makes the same temperature feel considerably hotter.

An infrared cabin heats you directly. Carbon panels emit radiant heat that your body absorbs without the air having to get anywhere near as hot. There is nothing to pour water on. There is no steam at any point.

That difference is why an infrared cabin can feel mild while you are the warmest thing in it, and why people who want the Finnish experience are usually disappointed by one.

The practical differences, which are the ones that decide it

Where it goes. This is the real argument for infrared. No foundation, no plumbing, no building permit, and a standard 120 volt outlet in most cases. A spare bedroom, a basement, the corner of a garage. A traditional sauna generally wants to be outdoors on a prepared base, and generally needs its own circuit run from the panel by an electrician.

What it costs to run. A one or two person infrared cabin draws roughly 1.5 to 2 kW, about the same as a space heater, and the panels cycle rather than running flat out. A traditional heater pulls six to nine kilowatts and spends thirty to forty-five minutes getting to temperature before anyone gets in. Four evenings a week through winter, that gap is visible on the bill.

Warm-up. Infrared is usable in ten or fifteen minutes. Traditional is not, which sounds trivial and turns out to matter enormously. A sauna you have to decide about forty minutes in advance gets used less than one you can switch on when you feel like it.

How many people. Infrared cabins are sized tightly, usually one to three, sitting upright. Traditional barrels and cabins hold more and let you lie down. If the point is two of you talking in the dark, that is a traditional sauna.

Volcanic stones glowing inside a stainless sauna heater

The part most shops leave out

The research everybody quotes about saunas is traditional sauna research.

The Finnish cohort work that gets cited in nearly every sauna advertisement measured traditional heat at a mean of around 174°F. Infrared cabins do not reach that and do not produce the same physiological load, so a finding from one does not transfer to the other.

Where infrared has been tested directly, the results have been more modest than the marketing. A randomized crossover trial that compared an infrared session against moderate exercise in healthy women set out specifically to test the exercise-mimetic claim, and found infrared did not reproduce the effects of exercise.

Hussain JN, Cohen MM, Mantri N, O'Malley CJ, Greaves RF. Infrared sauna as exercise-mimetic? Physiological responses to infrared sauna vs exercise in healthy women: a randomized controlled crossover trial. _Complementary Therapies in Medicine_ 2022;64:102798.

We sell both. We would rather you knew that than found out later.

So which one

Choose infrared if it has to live indoors, if nobody is going to run a new circuit, if you want to use it on a weeknight without planning ahead, or if a milder forty minutes suits you better than a brutal twelve.

Choose traditional if you want steam, if you want it hot enough that the cold afterwards becomes the point, if two or more of you will use it together, or if you have somewhere outside to put it and are willing to prepare a base.

Where we talk you out of something. If you want an infrared cabin because you read about the Finnish studies, buy a traditional sauna instead or buy the infrared for different reasons. The convenience, the price, the fact it fits in a spare room, those are all real and all sufficient. Borrowing evidence from the other product is not, and it is the single most common thing we see written about this category. Tell us the room, the outlet and how many of you there are, and we will tell you which one fits, including when the answer is neither.

Our infrared cabins are here, the traditional saunas are here, and if you are still deciding whether you will use one at all, this is the post about that.

Back to blog